An open letter:
Dear tossers
We want the Crusaders to play their regular sublime rugby.
By doing this will they achieve all the other PC crap you (the PC wankers) claim you want.
Message ends.
Thursday, 28 November 2019
Tuesday, 26 November 2019
Underpaying
I read today of four NI pharmacies underpaying staff by $20,000 over a year.
Notably the staff were Indian potential immigrants and the "director" named had a sub-Continent type name.
Has there been a case before the NZ courts in the last ten years where this has not been the case?
Is there a lesson we should be learning from this?
Notably the staff were Indian potential immigrants and the "director" named had a sub-Continent type name.
Has there been a case before the NZ courts in the last ten years where this has not been the case?
Is there a lesson we should be learning from this?
Jofra II
I still doubt Mr Archer was actually racially abused in Tauranga but if he was he now knows what every older white male in New Zealand feels like every time any young left-wing female opens her disgusting mouth.
Monday, 25 November 2019
Jofra
Jofra Archer claims he was racially abused by a member of the crowd in Tauranga.
I doubt he was.
Mr Archer is, of course, the dark-skinned, supremely talented, Pom quick bowler who so badly underperformed in the Tauranga test match.
He claims he was racially abused - despite also claiming he didn't know the meaning of the words allegedly used - after he was dismissed in the Pom second innings leaving his team only one wicket away from ignominious defeat.
I doubt he was racially abused because in every crowd of more than three people in New Zealand there is one wanker who will report to authorities and the slime, any comment overheard, directed at anyone other than a white man, that is not completely approbatory, yet not one complaint other than Archer's has been reported.
I also doubt the claim because most NZ cricket fans are not stupid and would have been applauding Mr Archer on his ineptitude that had him caught on the boundary.
More, I suspect, a poor loser than a victim.
I doubt he was.
Mr Archer is, of course, the dark-skinned, supremely talented, Pom quick bowler who so badly underperformed in the Tauranga test match.
He claims he was racially abused - despite also claiming he didn't know the meaning of the words allegedly used - after he was dismissed in the Pom second innings leaving his team only one wicket away from ignominious defeat.
I doubt he was racially abused because in every crowd of more than three people in New Zealand there is one wanker who will report to authorities and the slime, any comment overheard, directed at anyone other than a white man, that is not completely approbatory, yet not one complaint other than Archer's has been reported.
I also doubt the claim because most NZ cricket fans are not stupid and would have been applauding Mr Archer on his ineptitude that had him caught on the boundary.
More, I suspect, a poor loser than a victim.
Sunday, 24 November 2019
Clear the Decks - Forcefully!
I note "protesters" (read scum) have been forcibly removed from a ship in Timaru.
The ship was going about it's perfectly legal and above board business when these scum decided they could thieve the rights of those working on it, plus taxpayer money from NZ workers used to pay for cleaning the pollution off the ship by NZ police.
NZ now has dedicated armed police squads running around playing Tom Mix.
I suggest those armed police are made to earn their grossly inflated salary and ordered to go in shooting at every occasion when groups (or individuals) act on their thoughts that they are more important or know better than tax-paying New Zealanders.
I have no doubt after just one instance these thief scum will find another way of protesting, one that does not include disrupting the lives of honest New Zealanders.
The ship was going about it's perfectly legal and above board business when these scum decided they could thieve the rights of those working on it, plus taxpayer money from NZ workers used to pay for cleaning the pollution off the ship by NZ police.
NZ now has dedicated armed police squads running around playing Tom Mix.
I suggest those armed police are made to earn their grossly inflated salary and ordered to go in shooting at every occasion when groups (or individuals) act on their thoughts that they are more important or know better than tax-paying New Zealanders.
I have no doubt after just one instance these thief scum will find another way of protesting, one that does not include disrupting the lives of honest New Zealanders.
Last Rhino?
A headline on the AP Website:
Sumatran rhino is extinct in Malaysia as lone survivor dies
Surely if this female was the last one the species was extinct in Malaysia already.
Note also the "Extinct in Malaysia" bit.
There are, according to the story, about 80 Sumatran rhinos left so how does "extinct" get into the story?
Wednesday, 20 November 2019
That 'photo
There it is, I'm sure everyone living has now seen it.
The 'photo is of a middleaged man and a younger woman standing close together.
The man's hand is casually on the woman's waist.
Both are looking directly at the camera and both are smiling.
The young woman's eyes appear bright and happy giving her an attractive look.
Her body language in the 'photo suggests casual intimacy.
There are no signs, based on the photograph, that anything is other than all correct and above board.
The young woman now, many years later, claims she was being forced at the time to prostitute herself to the man.
The 'photo suggest, to me at least, that this claim is far from true.
I appear to be the only one who thinks this way - and I don't understand why.
Please note: I make no comment on age of protagonists, who's rooting whom, who's paying, etc. etc. etc.
The 'photo is of a middleaged man and a younger woman standing close together.
The man's hand is casually on the woman's waist.
Both are looking directly at the camera and both are smiling.
The young woman's eyes appear bright and happy giving her an attractive look.
Her body language in the 'photo suggests casual intimacy.
There are no signs, based on the photograph, that anything is other than all correct and above board.
The young woman now, many years later, claims she was being forced at the time to prostitute herself to the man.
The 'photo suggest, to me at least, that this claim is far from true.
I appear to be the only one who thinks this way - and I don't understand why.
Please note: I make no comment on age of protagonists, who's rooting whom, who's paying, etc. etc. etc.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)