I opened two different "news" sites this morning to be greeted by pictures of a massive arse.
Both British - the news sites not the arse.
The arse belongs to something called "Beyonce".
I have heard of "Beyonce" but have no idea what she does - if anything - to remain "famous" - I'm guessing she's a noise-maker ripping off millions of people not old enough to know better.
If so she is simply part of a 100 year old fraud and good on her.
I digress.
I don't understand why a (basically bare) arse is news.
It's not a particularly fine example of an arse, just big. I see more aesthetically pleasing arses, admittedly covered, just walking down the local high street.
It's not an arse being bared to protest, politically or otherwise.
It's just an arse.
The fact that it's basically bare (a G-string is apparently present) is not unusual and a quick perusal of some of the British news sites shows more and better arses, none of which are highlighted as the number one news item.
Maybe I'm getting old - or is there no news fit to print?
No comments:
Post a Comment