I'm worried that someone may find this blog.
It is not my intention, I write only that I may retain my thoughts, not for anyone else.
If you do find it, disregard it. It isn't for you.
If you've read this far you really are a masochist. Join the club.
I dreamed that someone actually read my comments and then critiqued my use of English.
I'd hate that!
Since that dream I have considered promoting this blog - and dismissed the idea.
Bloody silly idea!
Friday, 30 August 2019
Thursday, 29 August 2019
Fires
I have just read a column on fires around the globe.
https://breakingviewsnz.blogspot.com/
It is the third such column I've read in the last two days.
The annual Amazon fires have been in the news recently with the usual suspects, politicians who want to control your every thought and action, people who pretend to be someone else for a living, noise (usually of the horrible type) makers etc. making statements of the shock/horror type while every one of them comes up with the same solution, that being that eating meat, drinking anything other than water or milk and enjoying yourself is the reason Armageddon is nigh.
Having watched this phenomena for some time now I've decided there can only be one reaction to these people and those who repeat their propoganda.
There is no use arguing with them or pointing out the errors of their thinking.
From now on I shall, openly and in their face, laugh at them.
I encourage you to do the same.
https://breakingviewsnz.blogspot.com/
It is the third such column I've read in the last two days.
The annual Amazon fires have been in the news recently with the usual suspects, politicians who want to control your every thought and action, people who pretend to be someone else for a living, noise (usually of the horrible type) makers etc. making statements of the shock/horror type while every one of them comes up with the same solution, that being that eating meat, drinking anything other than water or milk and enjoying yourself is the reason Armageddon is nigh.
Having watched this phenomena for some time now I've decided there can only be one reaction to these people and those who repeat their propoganda.
There is no use arguing with them or pointing out the errors of their thinking.
From now on I shall, openly and in their face, laugh at them.
I encourage you to do the same.
free lunches
I notice the government has announced they will be trialing free lunches for some schools.
I haven't noticed the government announcing an investigation as to why some parents are not feeding their children despite being given excessive amounts of tax-payer money for the express purpose of doing so.
Could this government be, once again, trying to buy votes from the dishonest the lazy and the brain dead?
I haven't noticed the government announcing an investigation as to why some parents are not feeding their children despite being given excessive amounts of tax-payer money for the express purpose of doing so.
Could this government be, once again, trying to buy votes from the dishonest the lazy and the brain dead?
Shock! Horror!
Shock, horror headline on Newshub:
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2019/08/exploitative-beer-cheaper-than-a-can-of-coke-targeting-poor-auckland-communities.html
Isn't that what they want?
Isn't the great Satan sugar and, particularly, the sugar pushers, head of which is Coca Cola?
Beer is, in fact, good for you. It gives you malt, vitamins and minerals.
Coca Cola gives you pleasure, quenches your thirst and is produced by "Big Business" so must be very, very bad for anyone.
Surely even the tiniest greenie mind ( a serious competition indeed) must understand that beer is by far the preferable product.
So what is their problem?
'Exploitative': Beer cheaper than a can of coke targeting poor Auckland communities
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2019/08/exploitative-beer-cheaper-than-a-can-of-coke-targeting-poor-auckland-communities.html
Isn't that what they want?
Isn't the great Satan sugar and, particularly, the sugar pushers, head of which is Coca Cola?
Beer is, in fact, good for you. It gives you malt, vitamins and minerals.
Coca Cola gives you pleasure, quenches your thirst and is produced by "Big Business" so must be very, very bad for anyone.
Surely even the tiniest greenie mind ( a serious competition indeed) must understand that beer is by far the preferable product.
So what is their problem?
Wednesday, 28 August 2019
Fluoride
Given that NZ's drinking water is mostly fluoridated and NZ in 2017 voted in such a way the current government was made possible I fear this headline is correct.
ITN: FLUORIDE MAKES YOU STUPID.....
https://www.sott.net/article/419135-Objective-Health-ITN-Fluoride-Makes-You-Stupid-RFK-JR-Hits-Back-Tech-Censorship
Of course ChCh electing, twice, a grossly incompetent, leftist drunk tends to suggest it ain't only fluoride.
ITN: FLUORIDE MAKES YOU STUPID.....
https://www.sott.net/article/419135-Objective-Health-ITN-Fluoride-Makes-You-Stupid-RFK-JR-Hits-Back-Tech-Censorship
Of course ChCh electing, twice, a grossly incompetent, leftist drunk tends to suggest it ain't only fluoride.
Five? Yes!
Cricket's test haters are again talking a reduction to four days for test cricket.
In Colombo this last week we saw the perfect reason why five-day tests are still the best option.
Had that been a four day test the game would have resulted in a boring draw that would have further enhanced the anti-test argument.
Instead because the test had a fifth day we saw a marvelous finish where the visiting team was not just trying to dismiss the hosts for a win but also fighting the elements - in this case , light and pending rain - to gain that win and thirty points in the test championship.
If a test only goes four days, fantastic. Players and officials get a day off.
If a test is badly rain affected, as in Sri Lanka last week, five days mean we can still get a result and a brilliant, tension filled finish.
Notably many tests are rain affected and probably more will be while teams are forced to use extra days at different times of the year than is tradition to complete the recently introduced test championship
Until test cricket is played in covered stadiums let's keep the five day format.
Let's keep getting those wonderfully entertaining, result producing, final days.
In Colombo this last week we saw the perfect reason why five-day tests are still the best option.
Had that been a four day test the game would have resulted in a boring draw that would have further enhanced the anti-test argument.
Instead because the test had a fifth day we saw a marvelous finish where the visiting team was not just trying to dismiss the hosts for a win but also fighting the elements - in this case , light and pending rain - to gain that win and thirty points in the test championship.
If a test only goes four days, fantastic. Players and officials get a day off.
If a test is badly rain affected, as in Sri Lanka last week, five days mean we can still get a result and a brilliant, tension filled finish.
Notably many tests are rain affected and probably more will be while teams are forced to use extra days at different times of the year than is tradition to complete the recently introduced test championship
Until test cricket is played in covered stadiums let's keep the five day format.
Let's keep getting those wonderfully entertaining, result producing, final days.
Sunday, 25 August 2019
Disgusting at best
I watched the worst minute of television I've ever experienced last night (Sunday).
I watched it for about a minute because I was that shocked I needed the minute to believe what I was watching/listening to.
That minute was the most disgraceful racism I've ever heard broadcast.
It was the sort of thing sometimes heard in pubs or overheard in public, usually shouted by very small men or drunk and disheveled women who's main aim is to attract attention to themselves.
The sort of thing that passes for normal discourse among female (of both sexes) green politicians.
The program was something called The Comedy Cellar (or similar) and the minute was entirely a black sheila (it took some effort to restrain from a different word there) spouting racism.
The sheila was filmed in close-up, accompanied by what I assume iwas a laugh track - there was no humour, not even any attempt at humour in anything I heard during that minute so I doubt there was any noise at all from any audience present.
I enjoy comedy, particularly of the edgy kind, even when I'm the target, I enjoy laughing but to laugh something needs to be funny.
This wasn't.
"Each to his own, such is life" you may say but the problem I have was that had the role been reversed and this same shit spoken by a white, particularly by a white man, the slime would have a field day.
Every news organisation in the world would headline with demands for imprisonment, castration and anything else they could dream up.
Because it's by a sheila, a black sheila, it's somehow OK.
Why is any broadcaster, in this case SKY, allowed to present this blatantly racist crap?
I watched it for about a minute because I was that shocked I needed the minute to believe what I was watching/listening to.
That minute was the most disgraceful racism I've ever heard broadcast.
It was the sort of thing sometimes heard in pubs or overheard in public, usually shouted by very small men or drunk and disheveled women who's main aim is to attract attention to themselves.
The sort of thing that passes for normal discourse among female (of both sexes) green politicians.
The program was something called The Comedy Cellar (or similar) and the minute was entirely a black sheila (it took some effort to restrain from a different word there) spouting racism.
The sheila was filmed in close-up, accompanied by what I assume iwas a laugh track - there was no humour, not even any attempt at humour in anything I heard during that minute so I doubt there was any noise at all from any audience present.
I enjoy comedy, particularly of the edgy kind, even when I'm the target, I enjoy laughing but to laugh something needs to be funny.
This wasn't.
"Each to his own, such is life" you may say but the problem I have was that had the role been reversed and this same shit spoken by a white, particularly by a white man, the slime would have a field day.
Every news organisation in the world would headline with demands for imprisonment, castration and anything else they could dream up.
Because it's by a sheila, a black sheila, it's somehow OK.
Why is any broadcaster, in this case SKY, allowed to present this blatantly racist crap?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)