Three? No, give me Four.

 Three Strikes is back, protected again by the "manifestly unjust" clause.

I have no real problem with a clause that states that a Judge may ignore the wish of the People, as expressed by people given that power in a General Election (which the Judges don't go through) as long as that protection is itself protected by another clause.

That second clause should state that any Judge over-riding the 3 Strikes law should, if/when the criminal offends again, instantly and without trial or recourse, serve the time the criminal should be serving. That sentence to be carried out in a top security facility among the general population of that facility.

With that provision we should see less Judges and more Justice - both a positive.