Particularly:
It gets worse, according to David Cumin of the Coalition.
Believe it or not, the [misnamed] HRC argues that freedom to form an opinion is only applicable in private – that freedom of thought does not extend to being allowed to adopt thoughts or beliefs at a public event ...That an organisation calling itself by the name of "human rights' would argue this (if reported correctly) is appalling. It is good that the trial has helped reveal the true nature of this organisation.
Many have long known the HRC is badly faulted, imperfectly balancing political, sexual and racial bias.
By making this claim the HRC confirms this analysis.
No comments:
Post a Comment